2. Do you assist in the defense of criminal cases?
No.  Like everyone who holds our Constitutional protections dear, I believe that each accused is entitled to a fair trial and a zealous defense; however, my affiliation with certain professional associations, in particular the High Technology Crime Investigation Association (HTCIA), is predicated on my commitment to refrain from assisting in criminal defense.  I value teaching and collaborating with law enforcement, government and military forensic specialists, but they wouldn't feel comfortable if they felt I was using what they shared to undermine them in court.

You bet, and some pretty good ones.  Probably better looking, too.    If all you want is data recovery from a failed hard drive or someone to run a text search, you can find a capable tech who can do the job as well, for less.  But my clients are hiring me, and appreciate the fact that I'm both a longtime trial lawyer and a certified computer forensic examiner and electronic discovery expert.  They value the years I've spent in court and the insight that gives me into their cases and into the evidence and the users, witnesses, opposing experts and counsel.  They understand that being effective as a computer forensic expert demands more than just topnotch technical ability.  It's as important to be able to convey your findings, in coherent written reports and in testimony--clearly, persuasively, credibly.  The many courts who appoint me to serve as a neutral expert or Special Master also like that I straddle the realms of law and technology, understand the laws of evidence and procedure and, perhaps most importantly of all, am bound as an attorney to uphold the ethical standards of an officer of the court.  I don't seek or accept engagement as counsel in the case, but my legal knowledge and experience always contribute to my efforts.